if companies operate in the same way in china as china operates— the same way in china as china operatesrope. we have also seen a _ operates in europe. we have also seen a significant number of instances where new security regulations in general are beginning to impact— regulations in general are beginning to impact the ability of european companies to sell to china. i think it is fair— companies to sell to china. i think it is fair to — companies to sell to china. i think it is fair to say that europe still remains — it is fair to say that europe still remains a _ it is fair to say that europe still remains a significantly dependent on china, _ remains a significantly dependent on china, ratherthan remains a significantly dependent on china, rather than the other way around — china, rather than the other way around. that is in there needs to change — around. that is in there needs to change it— around. that is in there needs to chance. , around. that is in there needs to chante, , ., around. that is in there needs to chance. ,., , ., around. that is in there needs to chance. , ., , ., .

so here in china here in china. so they are again, opportunities and challenges. but it's very important for people to come back to china and look at what's going on. it's very different from what we're reading the news and it's the same time alternately. it is through the businesses and collaborations and continuing dialogue that we can find ways to work together. the chinese premier spoke about a living playing field between international companies and chinese companies. so if you come to try it out, he said the v b level playing t, it, do you see this? the chinese top leadership has been very committed and consistent in sending the message that china is still very open and the china is very dedicated to opening ups and to economic reforms. so they are gaps that many foreign business or see the intention is good. but there need to be a lot more improvements in terms of practical every day, policies and support for both domestic and foreign companies. what kind of gaps, for example of this would be a lot. i don't want to. okay. so you see many opportunities and y

r is china's intent and china's a set that of the situationit note china -- ct president most negativeer label was in life as a traitor. the ps has seen, actual last week, righ initial guidelines on how china willpun. folks in particular china intends more punishment on the leaders of taiwan independence. china didn'tuitel name william but i think those of us are following thi a this as being labeled a target. use measures china did not■ take under the pirate past■0 ar bothe will and the intent committed andre chinese as glcm more chinese coercion may expect in the near-term versus■4 long-term, i am of the view that equating could happen anytime. because right now to be honest wouldn't have great response and just cited china which engage in 14 -- what you taiwan. it would not be necessary that cossey for china. but a quarantinero a blockade comps i would kitchen blockade invasion of those are probably options keep at a later time closer to 1.7 or later than the immediate future. >> thanks party.■ce nonincome ay people work on this issue so i hoping to some of you will jump in. me turn

for china interest. that being said, look. busy you know, let's, let's really come to the end and that's really solve this issue. and the find a solution to that. and probably china, but think of now is global solves, would have more influence on china. originally, it is something ways, the 0 a 6 point piece of time for a for ukranian and, and the a roger and conflict and the i, the turkish for a minister common to assist you do a few days ago. imagine and the saying that the talk is, is also would like to what was trying to help on those conflict in, in a me that is the only in uh, you know, russian on your credit. so. so i think there's a lot of things that to china can play a more active uh, uh, you know, piece me making and peace. me the agent role. no, i then used to be so, so i think it's also because china has a vested interest to see a more prosper and more stable book just for work that is really binding site and both drawn on the war. do you think there's a pathway with the international instit

that this was a big to china, that china wanted to control. so chinas now in this position.le to be happy and not protect thing and to make itmically in the world. but it needs to don't topple the party. thanks. thanks a lot. thanks a lot, eleanor. so we have really richo the expf our commentators but i think also to the book that raises many questions about the right level of analysis. can get out of the dynamic paradigm model? what can we get out of comparative analysis and what are the normative implications? so i'll give the floor to what u would like to react to before open it up to a broader q&a. yeah so the good thing about a very rich discussion from harry and eleanor is that a guy can pick choose the question that you asked me, but i do see the common theme in your discussion is like you know, is china really different from thehy us d how how does different from the us or are they mean think not og i want to highlight for those audience who don't know the tech sector very well is that china is really the only country. so far that have been able to foster a tech gian

i mean, china is not playing fair on this, and china has created over capacities in a, in, in china with even vehicles. a 50000000 b is the own market can absorb only 22000000. so they're more than 20000000 cars over capacities from china. and they're looking for market, the u. s. old. already close the market. japan did all the markets is a to and the europeans to think, okay, we are for you. well, we are free markets and just to let them come, that will be great big problem. so i think the terrace, uh, how important measurement to put a china under pressure to negotiate with china, to change. that's clifford, as son environmental are, advocates are arguing that in fact, by shutting out shaped eaves, we are undermining our own green goals. is there something to that to? well, i think i think the whole argument we could talk about the visa as, as the environmental aspect, gives it's another argument. i mean, essentially when you have electronic vehicle, a lot of this is a bad batteries and ultimately be id for example, the comment or is, is a battery company and everything they do is the

so companies are adopting in china for china strategy for the at the end of the day. we certainly see that there are a companies that got frustrated and left at the same time. there are companies that are really trying to find ways to stay in china if not to actually invest more. because there is a lot of advantages about this market. this is a market that has a bond in labor supplies is relatively cheap. and at the same time, the economy of scale, that is something that no other countries can really compete with china as of the moment. so while certain companies are actually be looking at diversification, so away from china, many companies are still find ways to really stay. if not, to invest more. thank you very much for taking your time. thank you. of the invalid of an odd rules, the sweetness button. why is that and how can i find the best pieces? i asked someone who knows the city streets i've seen inside out then is the tickets we have this large, this big thing is i talked to you. but the beauty is also the details. and some of them, you know, like business on

of china. and he said, well, the signs of the chinese government were clear. they said, we will, we will go into each each vehicles and we ask, what is the w doing? and he said, what, as long as we can say, oh combustion? so, well, why should we change all the plans? are we the old times already? but we should, we shouldn't change on until we say, because we're sell so well with a combustion. and then uh, and then a few years later than the independent mccain. and, and the chinese competitors, they developed further and the german cost didn't. and now we have this like off a few years and it's hard to catch up. now put that together for us, if you would, clifford with the last point that was made in the report, the idea that the german industry is often often lagging behind when it comes to onboard software. would you say that the greater disruption has been de carboned ization or has it been digitalization? or is it both? i think it's possibly both. um. there's a lot of different factors of pl

i think china is besieged as it almost broke up. i think what china will be perceived as it is. it says any up to 8 in diplomacy years down the line, the china can be a guarantor for russia just as the us and the even you came to be a guarantor of the frank apple piece process as the featured talking just to have a guarantor, a front of the channel, someone who will maintain each organization. ok, joiner is more or less selective if indeed frank conflicts equations my think as an oldest blanket for everybody. david, so i just got a brief response to you on that before i get to my notes. credit question. well, the main issue i'm trying to isn't a difficult position with russia, ukraine because of and as, as anti noted, there's a lot of european concerned about this. and i would, i would argue that the europeans are actually driving the train here and out the united states. and we're interested, but this is about vital matter. we haven't seen the evidence of direct provision of military uh, seems like shells and missiles. but the concern is over dual use technology, most notably,

second, what is china doing?launching a project china 360o better understand china's global activity and have countries respond to them. third, how should the united states compete? we are standing up a china policy accelerator to produce granular policy recommendations on what america should do not just abroad but at home. for example how should america fix it's in industrial base harness technology and innovation, protect critical infrastructure and cyber attack or implement industrial policies that is with the accelerator whr will seek to figure out. fourth, how do we manage competition, work together and avoid war. our new global time formal lunchconversation with experts m china and from countries around the world to answer that question for the china strategy initiative deep in research in key areas from defense and diplomacy to economics and technology. from prostate issues in china's domestic development to transnational challenges and global governance. big challenge is a bold initiatives we cannot do th

for china interest. that being said, look. busy you know, let's, let's really come to the end and that's really solve this issue. and the find a solution to that and probably in china, but they are not always global solves, would have more influence on china originally been something ways, but still a 6 point piece of time for a, for ukranian and, and roger and conflict and the i, the turkish for a minister competency to do a few days ago. imagine and the saying that to a talk is also would like to what was trying to help on those conflict in, in the me that is the only in, in uh, you know, rush and all you credit so. so i think there's a lot of things that to try to come play a more active uh, uh you know, peace, me making and peace. me the agent role? no, i then used to be so, so i think it's also because china has a vested interest to see a more prosper, most stable book, just from work that is really binding site in both china anymore. do you think there's a pathway with international institutions to

so what gets it died is really the french import, if uh, uh, vague or uh, from china because china has natural competitive advantages in producing new ways. we don't have that at the moment in europe. we should go into that direction to present applies to the st. i'm just so long as don't want to have any protection . so i'm just going to have to have competition. so how do you agree all industry is a games to the same kind of this story telling from the u. s. o biting 100 percent to texas on gift texas on, on china is because that is, that is just a reaction because he wanted to lose the residential action to, to, to don a job. so. okay. yeah, that's not fair. so the situation this uh, there are no uh, subsidies which are out of sale to the company is this uh, scaling for a fact which show we see in china and that of all us national competitive advantages. and there is no reason to tax that so, but i do have an interest. okay, well i want to get on to how china might respond here, vicky, i mean, they haven't said yet how they might retaliate, but say that will take every necessary mea

so because we just start with the south china sea plains, by china, over the years to large parts of it, china is investments and it's navy, according to official frequencies around $1.00 trillion allocated between 202420. 28. china was putting its money where it's now phase. well, certainly in this case where its claim is absolutely, well, i think if we look at the problems facing the world today, whether that's ukraine, whether that's the tragedy in gaza, that some of a genocide and the rising tensions in the south china sea, that none of these conflicts that are broken out would be possible without the involvement and the explicit support of the united states. and i think this is but fear in the south china sea that will the philippines be in the pacific equivalent of the ukraine, where the us wants to find russian down to the last few premium. is it attempting to find china down to the last filipino and i think china, it has been resolute and clear in saying that it believes on the concept of indivisible security where every state has the right to security, but not at the expense

you, do you think that china is neutral both officially and unofficially, but china, but china helpslook, it's one thing, what you think, you think analytically, and another thing, china legally, it emphasizes this, it takes a neutral position regarding the war of russia against ukraine, just like any other country, well, maybe there north korea declares supplies russia with its components for drones, for weapons, and so on, is this neutrality? china supplies complete, it must be proved legally, and there are relevant international institutions that should take care of it, just as iran supplies russia, north korea supplies, by the way, even despite the fact that the declaration, well, the un resolution, which directly prohibits military cooperation between russia, between north korea and any other country, but again, when we talk about any investigation, if there are legal arguments, then this is one. affairs and then it will be possible to discuss it there on various platforms, if it is just that we are talking about the fact that china is like something supplies, that is another ma

if uh, uh, vaguely from china because china has natural competitive advantages in producing new ways. we don't have that at the moment in europe. we should go into that direction, but the same applies to the same. i'm just saying, i'm just don't want to have any protection. so i'm just going to have to have competition. so good told me you will be calling to same games to the same kind of this story telling from the u. s. o a bite and 100 percent taxes on gift texas on, on china is cost. that is, that is just a reaction because you wanted to, to lose the residential election to, to, to donna jobs. so. okay. yeah, that's not fair. so the situation this, uh, there are no uh, subsidies we just added sale to the company is this uh, scaling effectuate show we see in china and that of all us national competitive advantages. and there is no reason to tax natural, imperative, and interest. okay, well i want to get onto how china might respond here, vicky, i mean they haven't said yet how they might retaliate, but said it will take every necessary measure to safe. got a the interest. what shou

, and that's why the president criticized, and this, in fact, china is unpleasant for china, china doesublic showdowns, however, it seemed very contrasted with this speech china, and the actions of ukraine looked like that, because literally the next day... our representative of the ministry of foreign affairs, the deputy minister of foreign affairs, went to china and apparently he was still trying to prove, perhaps, whether to convince china to participate, but... these were pre-planned consultations, it’s not that he left after zelensky’s speech, so to speak, obviously these conversations and the work of the ministry of foreign affairs in general, it was conducted in its own way, and accordingly, it looked like how ukraine seemed to leave amicably, or to make sure once again whether this china could not be involved, but china made its decision in advance, and this was repeatedly said. that is why there is absolutely no hope that the position will change today. but as you think, it is the chinese position, it is really dictated by the fact that china believed that russia should be invi

washington constantly omits china. no, you are a regional power, that's what obama did and now biden is doing, not to mention trump. trump is furious anti-chinese many events are also connected with the fact that elections are expected in november. if trump comes to power, well, then china will not be very happy. and they understand it. they already remembered those four years. when trump's decisions on the trade agreement to remove production from the territory of china greatly influenced the situation. moreover, let me remind you that due to the consequences of covid, and trump caused part of the epidemic itself, despite the fact that in january 2021, the new president biden was inaugurated. he wants to demand some kind of compensation from china and everything else. this is just an excuse. it's not about money, which can be won in the courts in america and demanded from china. this is a reason to put pressure on china and obtain favorable solutions from it, primarily economic. china is aware of this and is definitel

you couldn't make troubles between india and china between china and us between china and europe, off costs. how does this affect the mood insurance? i think the most important factors after china organizing this so on for some of that was the end of an individual new champions. itself shows that intern that they cannot be running a country and silas and if what fate is very important for china. and i think i think this you into it said is the fact that the hosting is it's a classic indicator. the fact that uh, it cannot be lighting, it cannot be operating, insight loose, and partnership and cooperation is important. and i think for trade or business, it's very, very important to keep the geopolitical aspects of the site and is the focus of in, you know, close economy and what's a good and, uh you and for india cannot survey that though china and other weight on it because in does one of the largest importer of, of chinese goods and the same with us and europe. so i think that is, so i think there's a natural dependency on, on all of them and all this 3 quarters. so totally that could

from china here? with best on corporation? this is the interest of us. a brilliant house that does we do appreciate the short shop the sauce advances. thank you so much and the food and thank you for joining us here and inside story we really do appreciate your time. thanks so much. well, thank you to for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting a website, that's l g 0, dot com. and for further discussion, go through all facebook page. that's facebook dot com forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on ex uh, handlers at a inside story for me told me to cry in the and tides. good bye for now the, the hard hitting intervenes is israel and obstacles piece. i think that's the new thing you have on his government with these says 5 digit, you say getting less of a thought provoking odd since the e you made weapons being used in gaza. no guns should be used in an offensive way. that's our facing realities. you're running mean what does he bring to the table? har

, and so the president criticized, and this, strictly speaking, china for china dislikes things, chinaublic showdowns, however, it looked very contrasted with this speech of china, and the actions of ukraine looked like, because literally the next day our representative of the foreign ministry, the deputy minister of foreign... affairs went to china and obviously he tried it is still possible to prove whether it is possible to convince china to participate, but i understand that these were pre-planned consultations, it is not that he left after zelensky’s speech, so to speak, obviously these conversations and the work of the ministry of foreign affairs in general, it was conducted in its own way, and accordingly it looked as if ukraine had gone amicably, or to make sure once again whether it was possible to involve china, but china had made its decision in advance, and it was repeatedly said, precisely therefore , there is absolutely no hope that the position will change today. but what do you think, such a chinese position, it is really dictated by the fact that china believed that ru

and it's not just china and the philippines that have these competing claims in the south china sea. is it, can you tell us a little bit about diplomatic efforts anything underway to try to resolve these tensions? yeah, absolutely. as again, cliff and mentioned in the air force is known as china or in the philippines, which have these competing claims across this, across the south trying to see an absolutely critical moments away for international trade. malaysia brunei and vietnam, also have interlocking chains to. and then the recent, the interesting developing we had last week that the vision, these were open to having discussions with the philippines side about that. and looking sightings in which they have competition over the vietnamese foreign ministry saying that they were ready to discuss the solution that is mutually beneficial. of course, that stands in quite style contrast to the approach that china is taking, which is much more competitive. and of course, from the philippines side, i think there will be welcoming that that overture from the vision to me is. but there's a

and tibet is part of china. . , ., , , . ., china.dalai lama and _ china. that is the aspect that the dalai lama and his - the dalai lama and his followers have been disputing, butjust followers have been disputing, but just a word followers have been disputing, butjust a word on the us bill, which complains about china demanding the dalai lama accept that tibet has been part of china since ancient times. it says bluntly that is false. the dalai llama is willing to agree to china's sovereignty. why is his agreeing to a current timeline so important to beijing? timeline so important to bei'in: ? ~ timeline so important to bei'in: ? . ., timeline so important to bei'inu? . ., ., ., beijing? the current dalai lama fled tibet in — beijing? the current dalai lama fled tibet in 1969, _ beijing? the current dalai lama fled tibet in 1969, partially - fled tibet in 1969, partially encouraged by the cia and american forces. this is well recorded. his holiness the dalai lama personally acknowledged that. now, his holiness the dalai lama said aft

so the terrace of from china. what you may actually see is a real push it to both industries and you are good. so i want to ask you very briefly because when you've got a few minutes left, i mean these terrace, basically buying time for europe to catch up to china. i think there's another mentions optimal sites in that i think your will spend a lot more to get ready, but the point about batteries with production takes place is a very significant one. and the china right now has the competitive advantage. okay, and a, what do you think is going to happen from this point on? obviously the terraces as likely to take effect on july, the 4th. if both sides failed to resolve the issue, we're going to see them get together and try and hash this out. well i think from the perspective of the training is the manufacturer is um, this is an unwelcome development. but the rate of the terrorists, i think, were designed to be more or less that acceptable, that the twenty's, the manufacturers would still continue to do business i

, when china announced its so-called four points, now that china was not at the summit, i personally. not understand what can make russia look in a different way to the results of the meeting in switzerland, especially considering what putin said the other day, that this is all profanation, this is an attempt to undermine russian-chinese unity, this is an attempt to aggress against russia from, as he said there, the western hosts of ukraine, his favorite wording, that is, how we want to involve russia in the second summit and at what cost, i repeat, i simply have no idea, but if we really want to, then we need to... work, at least to fulfill what was planned before this, but maybe chinese the representative of lihui was at a meeting of advisers on national security issues in jeji, maybe he just thought that it was ukraine that would be ready to change its position, accept the conditions offered by china, there is freezing, cooling, lack of any guarantees, neutral status, and so on then it is possible, because china will facilitate such a conversation, well, they saw that there is no s

if you could know, make troubles between india and china, between china and us between china and europe of costs. how does this affect the mood insurance? i think the most important factors after china organizing this. so for some of that was the end of it. i mean, we do have new champions here to serve shows that intern that they cannot be attending a country and titles and a 4th grade is very important for china. and i think, i think this you entered, said is the fact that the hosting is it's a classic indicator, the fact that it cannot be lighting, it cannot be operating, insight loose. and partnership and collaboration is important. and i think for trade or business, it's very, very important to keep the geopolitical aspects of the site and, and the focus of in, you know, course economy and also good and uh you and for india cannot survey without china and other weight on it because it does one of the largest importer of, of chinese goods and the same with us and europe. so i think that is, so i think there's a natural dependency on, on all of them and all of this 3 quarters. so tot

it'll china beckett's to reach over 1000000 car exports. however, it only took a year to go from by median to, to meeting another year to a surprise to see media in 2020. so we try not exported over 5 medium vehicles, becoming the boards largest con, explore to install the new stuff to the screen. i don't think this growth will continue as entire regions will start sealing off their markets. currently only the europeans haven't done so, but they probably will. soon what we're seeing is essentially marketing closing. and chinese automakers will also be effective tonight. and as they won't be able to continue marketing their cars globally, you know, to statewide the market print a closer look at the top 10 destinations for trying these con, exports in 2023 suggests that the threats of significance tire of increases in the us and europe, one stop chinese cars from finding buyers are running toward the u. s. ranks for teens and germany ranks sixteens among the export destinations. in contrast, for germany try those car market remains crucial. t

are you more than china? nearly every province, most numerous and national level, t industrial parks or development zones. the purpose of planning on the even advertising slogans and promotional reviews of these areas are very similar to insure economic growth and maintain the political standing. local governments have heavily subsidized the local manufacturing and high tech industries from an economic perspective, subsidies these toward market mechanisms and lead to welfare loses for society as a whole. however, europe and the us have also been active in providing subsidies, but it comes to the criticism of chinese subsidies. i believe this is a pretext to the chinese government has massively supported the sector, but this is no different from good industrial policies in europe or the us think about air bus in europe. and think about that. it could have become a market competitor without substantial subsidies and industrial policy support. and those 2 point it to go. however, some of you with that chinese go

if china us pension was _ us and china. if china us pension was somehow. us and china.us and china. if china us - pension was somehow to ease and china was to be able to work better together, that would enable china to put more pressure on russia and ukraine and pressure on north korea, but a lot of this depends on the relationship between the us and china. because the tension between the united states and china is so great that it is difficult for the united states to exercise much leverage on china in the ukraine war. we are also seeing optics as well. there is panda diplomacy, pictures coming in. how is that going to be viewed and will that go beyond the objects and actually send the message that china wants to send? and how will it be perceived by the west? . . , will it be perceived by the west? ., ., , ., ., will it be perceived by the west? ., ., ., ., west? pandas are important to china. there _ west? pandas are important to china. there are _ west? pandas are important to china. there are two _ west? pandas are important to china. there are two bed - west? pand

pandas are important to china! _ china wants to send? pandas are important to china!ortant to china! they're two l important to china! they're two pandas at australia. i think it's important. people love families and to go to the zoo �*s. that's what the national security relationships are related very important. the good news here is that it seems that australia and china started to catch up. pandas diplomacy _ started to catch up. pandas diplomacy has _ started to catch up. pandas diplomacy has anything - started to catch up. pandas diplomacy has anything for| started to catch up. pandasl diplomacy has anything for a long time. but thank you. more on that on our website. president zelensky has said ukraine would hold peace talks with russia tomorrow if moscow's troops left his country. but he said vladimir putin would not end the war, and had to be stopped in any way possible. he was speaking at the end of a conference in switzerland in which delegates from around 90 countries discussed proposals for peace. but some key countries that have maintained relations with

, well, my hometown is china, the center, well, it’s called puyang, province hana, the city of puyangen i arrived in belarus i saw that the sky was very strong and the water was very clean. the air, the air is very good, and the people are kind and the girl is very beautiful, i came from china, from a province inside mongolia, when in china i learned and heard this completely different culture here, and i want to feel it, so i came to belarus, i arrived at... arrived at preparatory department, studying russian, then entered the university. in china, i am very worried, when i found out, i need to go to belarus, because there are no acquaintances here, no parents, everything else is different, but then teachers and belu friends, belu friends and chinese friends are a lot to me. they helped, so i quickly liked it here, this is the first time i left my hometown, and uh, i’m here somehow at first i don’t know how to do anything, i can’t go to the store, i can’t buy, and i quickly found friends, of course for life it's hard, but uh, i'm very grateful that i left. i can do everything here my

why should china do that? attend, fine, but there is no need for china to dissuade other countries from attending. that doesn't look credible to me at all. ., doesn't look credible to me at all. . . , doesn't look credible to me at all. . all. china has publicly tried to stay out _ all. china has publicly tried to stay out of _ all. china has publicly tried to stay out of involvementl all. china has publicly tried - to stay out of involvement when it comes to ukraine, is that likely to change? i it comes to ukraine, is that likely to change?— it comes to ukraine, is that likely to change? i don't think china has _ likely to change? i don't think china has actually _ likely to change? i don't think china has actually stayed - likely to change? i don't think china has actually stayed out| china has actually stayed out of this conflict. it china has actually stayed out of this conflict.— of this conflict. it hasn't condemned _ of this conflict. it hasn't condemned russia. - of this conflict. it hasn't i condemned